The CRB check has come under fire yet again after some diligent work by our friends at the Manifesto Club revealed that charities had spent around £350 million on criminal record
checks on their workers and prospective volunteers.
People who devoted their spare time to helping out in their communities say they found the vetting process “thoroughly insulting” while the bureaucracy it entails creates a “burden and a bore”.
Even people who sell tickets to a botanic garden or offer to write a local newsletter have been told that they must have their backgrounds checked in case they pose a risk to children.
The new report, Volunteering Made Difficult, discloses that 3.87m volunteers have been vetted over the past eight years – a fifth of the total. A further 2m are likely to have to sign up when the Government’s new vetting and barring scheme, now on hold pending a review, comes into force.
Although volunteers themselves do not pay to be vetted, their organisations must pay a £20 administration fee while the rest of the cost is borne by CRB checks paid for by companies and public sector bodies.
Yesterday's report once again confirms that the CRB scheme is neither efficient nor cost effective. The fact that these charities are spending such large amounts of their budget on lengthy checks and not on their worthwhile causes will seem outrageous to many people.
The real trouble here is that even very minor jobs entail such measures, which results in a lack of motivation to help worthy organisations. Similarly, those working for these charities who require annual CRB checks are increasingly losing patience with the administration and suspicion that they are being subjected to.
Of course CRB checks are vital in certain situations, but the Coalition Government needs to smarten the system – making it proportionate and reasonable – instead of persisting with the pointless Vetting and Barring scheme which alienates and insults those trying to give their time and effort to good causes.
By Rory Fitzherbert