Police back down over spy cameras – an amazing result in Birmingham

Hundreds-of-people-packed-the-bordesley-centre-328080254 As we have discussed previously, there is quite rightly an ongoing furore in Birmingham over "Project Champion" – the network of spy cameras that has been installed there. 218 cameras ring a community, covering every route into a residential area, set up to automatically monitor those who enter and leave. A further 72 covert cameras are installed in the same area (a number which has grown significantly after Freedom of Information requests forced the authorities to come clean).

You will not be surprised to learn that the people who live in that community are mostly Muslim. In the form of Project Champion, hundreds of households are being singled out by the state for surveillance on the basis of (i) where they live and (ii) the god to whom they pray. This cannot be right – morally, or in law. And if it can happen there, it will happen elsewhere. If it is allowed to stand in one place, it will happen again and again until it is the norm for all of us to be watched like this. Fortunately for us, the good people of Birmingham are not taking this lying down. They have protested and protested, and they have been heard.

The scheme has now been suspended pending a review. The authorities claimed that they suspended the scheme because they retrospectively realised that they should have held a local consultation. This is not true, of course. Local residents are never consulted on the erection of cameras in their areas (although as outlined in our manifesto, we believe that they should be). The scheme was stopped only because local residents made them stop.

I spoke last night at a meeting devoted to this issue – the fact that hundreds of people attended at short notice just goes to show how upset the community there is. Please do take a look at the Birmingham Mail coverage of the meeting.

A number of local council representatives (of all parties) spoke. They were unanimous in pointing out that they had not been consulted or even informed that this was happening. The same was apparently true of local MPs.

The newly appointed  Assistant Chief Constable, Sharon Rowe, attended. She was gracious under fire and did very well to deal with someone else's mess (the people responsible for Champion have been "promoted" away from the area). She made a number of significant concessions:

  • The counter-terrorism unit will have no future input on the programme.
  • Project Champion will remain suspended until a consultation has been completed.
  • If the consultation demonstrates that the community as a whole is against Champion, it will be dismantled.

Notwithstanding the fact that this Project should not have been started in the first place, this is all good. However, the meeting – masterfully chaired by the Stirrer's Adrian Goldberg – produced what I think to be an appropriate and reasonable resolution – that the consultation should not begin until the cameras have been taken down. The fear of a fait accomplit is genuine; ACC Rowe made noises about the amount of money that has been spent on Champion not going to waste. That's an argument that must not be allowed to hold water – else the instruments of intrusion (ID cards, a national NHS database) will continue because of the bad money that's already been thrown at them. The authorities have promised to put bags on the cameras – they have yet to do so, although I cannot fathom why this is so difficult. In any case, the bags aren't enough. The cameras should come down, and only then should the dialogue begin.

Still, a good day. Steve Jolly and the Birmingham Against Spy Cameras team have run an incredible campaign. Birmingham is the front line in the fight against the surveillance state and they have acquitted themselves remarkably well. We are all very lucky that it was this group of people the state decided to pick on. Lots of other people would have buckled or not bothered. It is thanks to their strength that the state has been checked. Because of their campaign, people up and down the country are now less likely to be spied on in this way.

It's not over yet, by a long way. But the example of Birmingham shows that the growth of the bullying state can be beaten back, if we stand up for ourselves.

By Alex

My speech is here

The Facebook group for the campaign is here

Posted by on Jul 5, 2010 in CCTV | 14 Comments


  1. Neil
    5th July 2010

    A good result. Well done Alex.

  2. jono
    5th July 2010

    From the comments at the Birmingham Mail:
    “Surely if these people are law abiding and want safety, then why the fuss over these cameras? Perhaps they have something to hide…? It hardly fills me with confidence when residents block CCTV cameras in a busy public area; I will NEVER go there for fear of my own safety.”
    This is called loving big brother. Its was only a matter of before people became fearful of *not* being watched. What a sorry state of affairs.

  3. DavidNcl
    5th July 2010

    “a community”

  4. Happiness
    5th July 2010

    Yes, all those cameras, but crime is still at an all time high.
    What we need is upstanding police officers on the streets tackling crimes, not more cameras.
    Besides, cameras cannot stop a crime in progress, but eagle-eyed police officers doing what they are supposed to do can help to prevent crimes from even taking place.

  5. Redacted
    5th July 2010

    Well done Birmingham and everyone involved.
    The thing about police powers is where the line is drawn. There must be a line because police power is actually licensed criminality. Police are licensed to use force against people, to break into buildings, to lock people up and deprive them of liberty, even to kill. All of these things are crimes when done by others, and indeed are crimes if done wrongly by the police. We agree to this licensed criminality so long as it counters a criminality of which we are more afraid. Once police powers increase beyond a certain point, the police start looking like the problem, instead of the solution.
    You can’t entirely blame the police for pushing their luck so long as the people let them get away with it. Pushing back is the right and proper thing to do in a democracy.

  6. Purlieu
    5th July 2010

    “Surely if these people are law abiding and want safety, then why the fuss over these cameras? Perhaps they have something to hide…?”
    Anne Frank had nothing to hide.

  7. NeverSurrender
    6th July 2010

    This is proof of what I have been saying all along – That nothing will change until enough people start making their voices heard.
    This is just the beginning. We want to see this happening right across the entire country. Let them know in no uncertain terms that people do not like being spied on and treated like suspects. Tell them to take down their ghastly, intrusive and degrading devices and to stop treating us like criminals!

  8. Spy Cameras
    6th December 2010

    Well done Birmingham and everyone involved.

  9. Shox NZ
    10th January 2011

    Fortunately, although it has not been due to pay it, but he was still on the road…

  10. supra shoes
    15th February 2011


  11. cheap supra shoes
    29th March 2011

    It almost worked for them but I, for one am glad it didn’t Spain were deserved victors and I had no sympathy for the Dutch. As BBC wrapped up their coverage the pundits debated who was better – Xavi or Iniesta? My gut reaction is to plump for Xavi. He just seemed to control the game more whereas Iniesta, while always good sometimes showed his talents more sporadically..

  12. Nike Free Running Shoes
    15th April 2011

    coaching your puppy as soon as you possibly can to stop Boxer aggression difficulties like Boxer biting and Boxer barking loudly on strangers.

  13. Cheap Louis Vuitton
    30th June 2011

    We’re not going to lie — we’ve cut corners all over the place.

  14. Anonymous
    17th July 2011

    Now the police need to sit back, relax, and watch Facebook. There’s no way the thieves will be able to resist posting photos of themselves with Bob on the night of adventure they undoubtedly shared with him.


Leave a Reply