The IOCC report finds institutional overuse of powers and woefully inadequate record keeping

Image3The Interception of Communications Commissioner has published his annual report highlighting the way that surveillance powers, provided under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, are used.

This report is a marked improvement on the quality and quantity of information that has been presented in the past, highlighting that it is certainly possible to be more transparent about how surveillance powers are used without jeapordising security. Yet there is much more than can and should be done to reassure the public.

For instance, whilst we are told that the total number of approved authorsations and notices for communications data (excluding urgent oral applications) in 2013 was 514,608, the fact remains that this report does not include the number of British citizens affected by these powers, or any meaningful detail on what sort of offences are being investigated. The Commissioner acknowledges this fact within the report, stating that In my view the unreliability and inadequacy of the statistical requirements is a significant problem which requires attention”.

The report does however break down the authorities who requested the data, highlighting that 87.7% were made by police forces meaning only 11.5% were made by the intelligence agencies. Considering the rhetoric surrounding  the use of surveillance powers, it is somewhat of a shock to hear that only 11.4% were made for “national security”, whilst 76.9% were made for to “prevent or detect crime or prevent disorder“.

In light of this, the Commissioner raises his concerns regarding the “significant institutional overuse” of surveillance powers, noting that he believes the 514,608 figure appears “to be a very large number” and “the feel of being too many”. As a result, he has asked his inspectors to take a “critical look” at how the powers are being used, especially in the case of police forces.

Judging from this report it is clear that the Government needs to urgently address the fact that the Commissioner has grounds to believe some powers are institutionally over-used and that the records kept by public authorities are woefully inadequate. This does not require new legislation and should not wait until after the election. If the Government fails to address these serious points, we can already know that next years report will not be a document that the public can feel confident in.

Posted by on Apr 8, 2014 in Home | 5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. UK Surveillance Watchdog Releases Report Endorsing UK Surveillance Programs | Just Security
    11th April 2014

    […] written with such candor and openness, that one can hardly question the sincerity of its belief. Big Brother Watch, a member of the aforementioned Don’t Spy On Us coalition, notes that the report is “a marked […]

    Reply
  2. Tony Burchell
    11th April 2014

    To ‘prevent’ and ‘detect’ crime or ‘prevent’ disorder. Eighty seven percent (87)% requested by the police. No wonder they are concerned about ‘disorder. Maybe it would be valuable to compare/contrast pre 1989 East German (Stasi) statistics to see whether we are on the right track for Orwellian 1984 world.

    Reply
  3. The UK’s response to Snowden’s revelations lets Putin off the hook – The Guardian | NewsBreakOnline.com
    20th April 2014

    […] reports issued by previous commissioners during the pre-Snowden era, there are some improvements, with Big Brother Watch noting “a marked improvement on the quality and quantity of information that has been presented in […]

    Reply
  4. The UK’s response to Snowden’s revelations lets Putin off the hook – The Guardian | GreatNewsUpdate
    20th April 2014

    […] reports issued by previous commissioners during the pre-Snowden era, there are some improvements, with Big Brother Watch noting “a marked improvement on the quality and quantity of information that has been presented in […]

    Reply
  5. Big Brother Watch: Traffic spies – a £312m industry | UK Independence Party In Essex
    6th May 2014

    […] Woefully inadequate surveillance records The Interception of Communications Commissioner has published his annual report highlighting the way that surveillance powers are used. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply