• Media Enquiries

    07505 448925(24hr)

Want your children to have school dinners? Surrender their fingerprints

Andrea 2 Andrea Leadsom is the Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for South Northamptonshire

Last week I had the pleasure of accompanying a group of students from Sponne and Campion Schools to the Houses of Parliament.  But over our sandwiches afterwards, sitting on a wall in the drizzle of a cold Monday in Westminster, one of the students raised an issue with me that I found truly shocking.

He wanted to know if I thought that fingerprinting/iris scanning of children in schools might breach their Human Rights under EU legislation.  I was surprised as, until he explained further, I was unaware that millions of our children are right now being required by their schools to have fingerprints or iris scans done in order to borrow a library book or buy their lunch.

How would you feel if the government suddenly passed a law that every adult had to be fingerprinted at their local police station? Yet schools it would appear have accumulated fingerprint or iris data on millions of children, some as young as three. And apparently often without their parents' consent.

My student friend told me that a member of his family working in security systems believes that with a few hundred pounds of ‘hacking’ equipment, it would be possible to sit in a car outside the school gates and collect all that data.  The lifelong, permanently distinguishing data of children is at risk of being lost or stolen, and for what? 

I really fear for the direction this country is headed in.  There are so many examples of data being lost or stolen – collecting this permanent record of a human being should only be done for extreme reasons and certainly not for identifying whose library book is due back.

We risk the next generation growing up with an acceptance of cradle-to-grave state snooping and control, with all the errors and potential for identity theft that will ensue.  What's more, millions of pounds of taxpayers' money must be being wasted on installing fingerprint/iris readers in schools.

Liverpool Council has rejected this recording of children.  I will be writing to Northants County Council in the hope that they will do likewise.

We shall be watching for the results of Andrea's campaign with great interest.  If you want to oppose fingerprinting in your school, get in touch with Big Brother Watch, or with the excellent Leave Them Kids Alone campaign.

Posted on by Alex Deane Posted in Guest Posts
  • John Smith

    “We risk the next generation growing up with an acceptance of cradle-to-grave state snooping and control”
    I thought that was rather the point of the exercise, no?
    It ties in nicely with the government’s whole ID card ethos of targeting the young and old, and foreign, who are less likely to refuse, first, using ‘entitlement’ as an excuse.
    I’m emigrating at the end of December, and every day spent in this country just provides more confirmation that I’ve made the right decision.

  • Jon W

    When my son was 5 (2 years ago) his school wanted to fingerprint him and all pupils “for use with the new library”. We were not allowed to refuse, despite this being illegal and immoral. We immediately removed him from the school and my wife has been home educating him ever since as we feel we can no longer trust a school system or govt who would take our children’s fingerprints without our consent.
    Ed Balls has a lot to answer for!
    Glad to see you have picked up on this; the amount of people who are deaf to this or who plain just don’t care is scary :-(
    This site has taken a stand: http://www.leavethemkidsalone.com

  • Stuart

    Sadly, this is an old issue. I corresponded with my school at length and received disingenuous and ignorant responses.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/alexdeane Alex Deane

    It’s right to say that this is an old issue – but it’s one we intend to keep fighting on, and one that sadly few people know about!

  • http://alastairs-place.net alastair

    No, no, this is hysteria again.
    Your student friend’s family member may or may not be right that someone could theoretically break in to the school’s computer systems, but what *exactly* do you propose that they would gain by so doing? Are you seriously proposing that someone will steal biometric data (and let’s not forget that the operator of the “hacking equipment” needs to be at least marginally competent) and use it to fake peoples’ fingerprints or irises? That’s the kind of thing that the intelligence agencies might get up to, but it’s a bit beyond your average criminal don’t you think?
    Additionally, the biometric data may not be in a form that would be useful for that kind of thing anyway. It’s likely been condensed down into a set of feature points, and so it would only be useful in constructing a fake fingerprint that could fool the school library computer. Hardly a worthwhile criminal activity (unless, perhaps, you have books that are several hundred years overdue :-D )
    Furthermore, it’s mischievous of you to say that schools are accumulating this data. They aren’t. They’re enrolling students in a biometric authentication system; they probably don’t even know themselves how to get the biometric data back out of it, if indeed that’s even possible (I can certainly think of ways of preventing it *completely* – for instance by storing a one way hash of the set of identified feature points, rather than storing any actual biometric data).

  • guy herbert

    I don’t quite agree with alastair, but I do think the whole idea of some terrible danger arising from “stealing childrens fingerprints” is an absurd red herring. Whats more of a problemn is the genreal tendency of schools to want to collect information, and the general powers of various tentacles of the DCSF to get hold of it.
    It isn’t the fingerprints for access to libraries or school meals you should be worried about, but what happens to computerised records of what your child reads or eats, and how they might be used to assess or manage him or her – or you – by the bureaucracy.

  • anonymous

    It is sad that some people are naive and do not know how privacy or information can be and abused by some, including some in positions of power or influence, let alone some who are labelled criminal. Privacy, dignity, freedom of conscience and freedom of speech without payback (overt or otherwise) except in a few very rare circumstances are essential for society, including to protect and discourage crime. Traditional checks and balances are needed, but it is also unwise to give too much power to anyone or to expose people or give info unnecessarily. Most of us lock our doors and don’t walk around naked in public for good reasons.
    This is not isolated. There is a scheme called zoom (bus pass) in Wales which I find disgusting and unwise. Apparently some in councils will know about kids’ mistakes or alleged mistakes (who didn’t make mistakes as a kid or adult) before the parents, minor alleged infractions will be noted and stored (and for how long), criminals could hack into the databases to find out kids’ schedules, and worst of all, undercover kids will snitch on others (and no doubt some kids will make mistakes in their snitching – wrong person, wrong offence, or exaggerated or understating offeces, some may make childish mistakes or malicious comments about others, and no doubt spying will become normalised as well as invasion of privacy). In addition, criminals or the nosey or those who cannot handle unnecessary knowledge will apparently have access to health details, which can be abused, and also lead to gossip. Apparently this is not a high-crime area, but even where there is high crime, some systems can be and do get abused. There will also be info which could be used to harm associates of the children. They too are put at risk by such naivety. Bullying and crime as well as childish mistakes or small indiscretions will not probably go down in the long-run. There will be some whose privacy is abused who will despair and some who become overly compliant or passive aggressive or other things. Traditional healthy forbearance, mercy and peacemaking – saying sorry, telling someone they hurt you, intermediaries and onlookers doing their part or not, respecting dignity etc are like muscles, if they are not used, the body of the community grows weak, and unhealthy systems harm not only directly but indirectly by reducing healthy community life. The Welsh have not always been treated well, will some of them in power now harm their own people, or will those that do (naively or otherwise) try to learn from when they were mistreated, bullied or when power was abused against them and treat those under their influence and control carefully, even when tempted by security or other problems? Having power or influence does not make someone better than others, there are glories and honour but also responsibility to those with less power, including children and adults under their authority. All people are valuable – we do not all have gifts which get us up the ladder, not everyone can be a leader, but all people – small or great in man’s eyes, have gifts and are worthy of respect. Gifts of kindness and work of all kinds, great or small, is to be valued. And those who are ill, young or small or less valuable or dispensable in the eyes
    of some in power or influence should remember that opportunity, success and money are good things and to be encouraged but that they are also a responsibility (as well as sometimes a burden). Power, success and giftss are from God (and occasionally from the evil), and we will all give an account to God one day for how we used them. They do not make us better, though they may bless us, and hopefully others too.
    Like gossip and slander, once info is out there, including misinfo and disinfo as well as accurate personal info, it can be abused and can take away from the dignity and reputation of the person about whom it is written. Shame on us all for allowing such systems! And I hope this scheme does not spread and the Zoom is adjusted and does not spread through Wales or the rest of Britain (there are also prizes for the stasi-style-snoops – bribery anyone?).

  • Bryan

    Alistair it is NOT hysteria.
    Our head teacher told me to take my child else where when I pointed out she was acting illegally in that the school had never told us about the biometric system. She asked if I would like to stop the children fineger-painting as well! She, you and others have NO idea what a Pandoras box Biometrics are. I am involved in IT to some depth. I do.
    First principle. It is not for the child/parent to prove its NOT SAFE. its of for the proponents of such systems to prove it is and will remain safe for at least the lifetime of the child.
    There is NO JUSTIFICATION for biometric to be used in schools. For national borders and the like yes for ID cards maybe, but for frivolous uses in schools NO. it is NOT PROPORTIONAL to the RISK. just because you do not understand the risk do not negate there is one.
    I have been told many lies about these systems such as reconstruction is not possible. Its a not a real fingerprint etc etc. Reconstruction is possible and this is well know and understood… and very very accurate. Accurate enough to fool other systems.
    Not worried about fingerprints being compromised. hmmm read this http://www.shirleymckie.com/
    Now ask how could a reconstruction of my childs print effect them now and in 5 , 10 , 20 years time?
    I offer that even if consent has been obtained it is invalid as it is not Informed consent.
    The ICOs position is not published but is that a school can use schedule 2.5 B&D to legalise the taking of biometrics without consent. I know it happened to me and my child.
    My appeal to ICO on the requirement for consenet failed . First class legal advice from one of the UKS best lawyers in this field states the ICO is incorrect in its position.
    I do not have the ££££ to take the ICO to court. My MP is being given the run around by Ed Balls et al.
    I am hoping the EU will get this sorted as per Marper case.
    It is not proportional. its a violation of article 8 of Human Rights Act.Also Biometrics DO contain sensitive information in that dermataglphys – fingerprints/palm prints etc- can contain information that is correlated with illness, sex and race.
    A recent bioethics paper in Ireland recommends all biometrics be classified as sensitive information. The Irish ICO makes it clear that uses in schools are not appropriate and he makes it clear the reasoning the UK ICO makes – compelling need- is not enough to override a child rights.
    I have many many academic references for my position. I suggest neophytes start here:
    http://www.bioethics.ie/uploads/docs/Final_Biometrics_Doc_HighRes.pdf
    “The Council recommends that biometric data should be classified as sensitive personal
    information and as such afforded greater protection”
    and if you do not believe biometrics are a Pandora’s box how about if I were to say I could extract your facial features from your fingerprints alone? Theoretically possible… No actual reality proven science available NOW
    http://www.fingerprint2face.org/
    So we have schools who do not understand basic data protection principles,let alone biometrics, utilising very very sensitive information for frivolous reasons. They are being given legitimisation by the body meant to protect us from such abuses. The ICO is either incompetent and has political reasons for its position read the following and make up your own mind.
    http://www.out-law.com/page-7727
    “The ICO said recently that it was too late to stop biometric scanning in schools, even if it wanted to. David Smith, deputy information commissioner, told technology news site The Register that: “For us to come out now and say fingerprinting isn’t allowed would be very difficult because these systems have come in over the last four years. We were asked about them and we said it was okay.”
    So Alistair still think this is hysteria?

  • http://www.suprashoesshop.net supra skytops

    [ this is good]