• Media Enquiries

    07505 448925(24hr)

Why Alan Johnson is wrong about CCTV

Cctv-Parliament Alan Johnson has just sung out a press conference in praise of CCTV – even wheeling out a poor women who was attacked and whose attacker was caught on camera.

I therefore thought it would be worth reviving our argument against CCTV surveillance, as taken from our report, released in December, called Big Brother is Watching.

1. CCTV has been viewed by those controlling expenditure as a cheap alternative to conventional policing, with no demonstrable equivalent success in reducing crime.

Remember, the Met Police said that only one crime is solved for every 1000 CCTV cameras and the proportion of all crimes solved using CCTV in London fell from half in 2003/4 to one in seven in 2008/9.

2. The efficacy of CCTV is open to challenge, with cameras regularly turned off, footage being deleted before it can be used and pictures of insufficient quality for court purposes.

Several local council CCTV networks do 'not meet Home Office recognised specifications'.

3. Local authorities have spent an unprecedented amount of money to make the United Kingdom the most watched nation of people anywhere in the world. That amount of spending on CCTV is steadily increasing, with funds being diverted from conventional policing budgets to pay for the new technology.

This argument is best made by security expert Bruce Schneier

4. CCTV serves as a placebo for many local authorities designed to appease neighbourhoods suffering from anti-social behaviour problems.

It is our contention that CCTV has been part of the largest public misinformation campaign in recent memory. It is rare that you open a local newspaper and do not find a local council extolling the benefits of their latest multi-thousand/million pound CCTV network. Finding the real stories – such as this one – takes more effort.

5. As the number of CCTV cameras increases, so does the potential number of people being watched and the number of council officers watching – with implications for personal privacy and data security.

Put simply, we have more CCTV cameras than any other country on the planet and the number is rising all the time. A responsible government would say that it is time to take a second look at our penchant for camera surveillance, instead of using it as a stick with which to beat one's rivals.

The call we make in our election manifesto is quite simple – give people a choice: more CCTV or the money spent on other forms of law enforcement? Of course CCTV can be essential in catching criminals after the event; but wouldn't it be great if we could stop the crime occurring in the first place?

By Dylan Sharpe

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in CCTV
  • guy herbert

    There’s one more thing. The presence of CCTV cameras may increase fear of crime. The Scarman Centre mentioned this in its review of CCTV for the Home Office a couple of years back – the same one that found “a paucity of evidence” that it was of use in preventing crime.

  • Purlieu

    Exactly, if your neighborhood is festooned with cctv cameras, your house price is going to suffer, since these give the message that it’s a dodgy area.

  • ralph

    Don’t CCTV’s just promote masked crime anyway?

  • John

    Alan Johnson has not got a clue about CCTV or the police state we currently live in.
    I voted against NL because
    1) it introduced a police state
    2) it introduced cultural Marxism
    3) it introduced Orwellian thought police (who tell people of faith how they should think on a range of issues)
    4) it privileges secular rights over spiritual rights
    5) it prevents me from manifesting my beliefs 24/7 in public and private
    6) it is godless and morally bankrupt
    I am not the only one that think we are living in a police state. Two MI5 chiefs and one senior Met policeman stated officially that we we were rapidly becoming a police state! They should know