• Media Enquiries

    07505 448925(24hr)

World’s largest association of pilots boycotts body scanners

Radiation_symbol_1 The world’s largest association of pilots has announced a boycott of full body scanners at airports, citing health risks.

The stance is taken following the suspension of an American pilot for refusing to be scanned, and the emergence of news that scanners may deliver 20 times more radiation than was announced by the authorities who introduced them.

The Allied Pilots Association recommends that members take a “pat down” search rather than expose themselves to the increased radiation from scanners.

Quite right too. As regular readers will know, Big Brother Watch has opposed body scanners since they were introduced, and pilots and cabin crews have been joining our campaign by the dozen ever since. Scanners are dangerous. There’s a reason that the nurse stands behind a screen when you get an x-ray at hospital. Radiation is potentially harmful, even in small doses, and the regularity with which frequent flyers are exposed to potentially cancer-causing radiation.

(All of this, of course, in quite apart from the significant privacy intrusion of body scanners, which have been abused by workers since they were introduced.)

If pilots aren’t going to be scanned, why should members of the public? This stance from a professional group, the world’s leading association of pilots, must shake the government out of its absurd position on scanners. In the UK alone you cannot opt for a pat-down search instead of a scan.

The Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety  (which includes the European Commission, International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Agency and the World Health Organization) has written a report that states that

1)    Air passengers should be made aware of the health risks of airport body screenings,
2)    governments must explain any decision to expose the public to higher levels of cancer-causing radiation
3)    Pregnant women and children should not be subject to scanning

By making scanning compulsory for all and by failing to publicise this guidance, the British Government is failing to do all of these things and is potentially jeopardising the health of vulnerable people as a result. The APA’s stance will hopefully wake our government to that fact.

By Alex Deane

Big Brother Watch maintains a rolling list of airports with scanners

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Body Scanners
  • http://ampers.wordpress.com Andrew Ampers Taylor

    If they want to remove weapons from Pilots, I suggest the security authorities don’t let the pilots anywhere near the controls of a multi-ton aircraft!!!!!!
    Ampers.

  • http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk 1984

    Hopefully this will send out a powerful message that passengers must be given a GENUINE ( in America the pat-down option is only offered with a bullying resentment on the part of the TSA ) choice of either body scan OR metal detector/pat-down. Some people prefer the former, some the latter – it should always be an individual choice, especially as both screening methods are of roughly equal ‘efficacy’. If the UK stick to their ludicrous stance when the Final Code of Practice for airport body scanners is published shortly then they will face a barrage of legal challenges. Let’s see if Theresa May and Philip Hammond have finally woken up.

  • Coco

    What do they mean! only pregnant women and children should not be scanned !
    I a a healthy Swedish female 30 years old and I do not want to have to be pregnant to not be subjected to radiation! I can not go home for Christmas because I was stupid enough to move to this country and now I can not get out.
    People with real intention get escorted past bodyscanners by government officials like the underwearbomber was. There are witnesses to this people look it up!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/lushfun Lushfun

    Finally someone took a stand, at least the pilots spoke out for the people. It seems like a mass sterilization project in disguise with all these scanners radiating your balls through and through.
    http://www.lushfun.com

  • Rohan Lienert

    Alex Deane, for future reference the people taking X-rays in hospitals are not Nurses but in fact Radiographers. Radiographers complete a Bachelor Degree in Diagnostic Radiography and prefer not to be referred to as Nurses.
    Regarding the story, I agree that exposing pilots to the incresed radiation is excessive and they should instead undergo a pat down.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/alexdeane Alex Deane

    @Rohan – that’s me told! Apologies!
    (Though you will appreciate that I have nothing but admiration for nurses and calling someone a nurse is not meant as a slur or anything, quite the reverse!)

  • http://patrick.veverka.net Patrick Veverka

    What about all of the TSA employees? Won’t they be exposed to radiation levels that are dangerously high?

  • Purlieu

    The pilots would have to go through the body scanners at least once, sometimes twice each working day. Not a couple of times a year like the average tourist. No wonder they are concerned about it. X-ray radiation is cumulative, remember.

  • ted

    The allied pilots association is not the largest. ALPA is about 5 times larger.

  • http://www.coachoutletsales.com coach outlet

    it’s been a great day!*

  • http://www.coach-online-outletstore.com Coach Outlet Canada

    It’s good to hear Chico’s still around and coming out with a new cd soon. I’ve been a fan of the brother for a while now and was glad you mentioned his first hit, “Talk to Me”. I wish you could’ve gotten him to talk about his relationship with Janet Jackson, though, as well as the stabbing incident in Philly a few years ago.

  • http://www.airjordan11shoes.net/ jordan 11

    These information helps me consider some useful things, keep up the good work.