According to news reports this morning, the former Conservative party leader and Home Secretary Michael Howard has joined the illiberal triumverate of David Blunkett, John Reid and Charles Clarke in opposing the abolition of control orders.
Michael Howard's position on this issue comes as no surprise whatsoever, given that he was the Home Secretary to first attempt the introduction of ID cards way back in 1996.
Control Orders give the Home Secretary the power to impose more stringent conditions on the movements and daily lives of individuals than those the Burmese military have placed on Aung San Suu Kyi. Those subjected to Control Orders can not only be placed under effctive house arrest but banned from associating with family members, owning mobile phones or attending their place of work – all without charge, without effective recourse to appeal and without knowledge of their accuser.
Speaking to Telegraph, Howard he "could not think of another way of ensuring people are safe from terrorists"
At Big Brother Watch, we can think of few less effective ways of ensuring people are safe from terrorists. The figures speak for themselves. Of the 45 orders imposed to date, seven of the individuals have absconded and the remainder have been discontinued.
It is a standing affront to the rule of law that, without charge, anyone’s liberty is curtailed – their freedom of movement and association are limited to the point at which they are, essentially, under indeterminate house arrest. This Kafkesque conception of justice is simply incomparible with any country which wishes to see itself as a liberal democracy.
David Cameron would do well to ignore Michael Howard's utterances on this issue – and those of the past Labour Home Secretaries whose record on civil liberties he has himself described as "woeful".
The alternatives to Control Orders and the like are outlined in Dominic Raab's excellent pamphlet for Big Brother Watch, Fight Terror, Defend Freedom.
-
http://profile.typepad.com/farahdamji1 FarahDamji
-
Headhunter



