• Media Enquiries

    07505 448925(24hr)

CCDP : What we know


After another day of confusion around the Government's plans for increased surveillance powers, it now appears there is some back-tracking and the bill will only be a 'draft'. Here's an update of some key points, while Privacy International have highlighted some serious issues with a briefing given to Liberal Democrat MPs. Key issues: The Coalition Agreement pledged: “We will end the storage of

Nine in ten people haven't read Google's new privacy policy


Research published today by Big Brother Watch highlights how only 12% of Google service users have read Google’s new privacy policy. The study, undertaken with YouGov, found while 92% of people online use a Google service on a regular basis, 65% of people were not aware the change comes into effect this week and 47% of people did not know any change was being proposed. This follows the Article 29 Working

The price of privacy : Councils spend half a billion pounds on CCTV in four years


Our latest report highlights the cost to local authorities of their CCTV operations - £515m in the past four years. There are now at least 51,600 CCTV cameras controlled by local authorities, with five councils now operating more than 1,000 cameras. In comparison, £515m would put an extra 4,121 police constables on the streets – the equivalent of Northumbria police’s entire force. The picture varies

Local authority data loss exposed


Big Brother Watch has published a report into the worrying scale of data loss across local authorities. We have uncovered more than 1000 incidents across 132 local authorities, including at least 35 councils who have lost information about children and those in care. Highly confidential information has been treated without the proper care and respect it deserves. At least 244 laptops and portable computers

Home

Let the punishment fit the heinous crime

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 6 Comments

Northampton's Al Capones have been taken down – taken DOWN, I tell you:

Alison McLaughlin, of Gallfield Court, Bellinge; Sheryl Wilkinson, of St
Leonards Road, Far Cotton; and Terri Louise Bradley, of Crescent,
Northampton, were all found guilty in their absence of offences relating
to leaving out rubbish bags.

McLaughlin and Wilkinson were both
issued with a £600 fine and must also pay £400 costs and a £15 victim
surcharge.

Bradley was issued with a £500 fine and must pay £400
costs and £15 victim surcharge.

Gordon Bennett.

By Alex
Deane

Hat tip: Booner

Primary school is sent to the ‘Flags Commission’

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 6 Comments

To mark the 65th anniversary of VE Day, the pupils at St Mary's Primary School in Beetley, Norfolk, created a new school crest, placed it on a flag and hoisted it above the school.

Schoolflags However the flag – funded by the Royal Marine Association in Norwich – had not long fluttered above St Mary's when a jobsworth from Breckland District Council arrived to inform the school that the flag required planning consent.

As Ralph Hedley, acting headmaster at the school, told the Daily Telegraph:

"Breckland Council told us that we needed to get permission from the Flags Commission. We understand that because the flag has the school's name on it it is deemed to be advertising.

"We have applied to the Flags Commission and called time and again but they haven't got back to us. To be honest once the flag is made we'll just fly it and if they ask us to take it down we'll take it down."

Last month a vicar was warned by council officials about flying a flag depicting Jesus outside his church because it was "religious advertising". 

A quick search of the internet has revealed nothing about this phantom 'Flags Commission', but fortunately a spokesman for Breckland Council was on hand:

"Flags used for advertising and promotional purposes are controlled under Advertisement Regulations and would require consent from the council."

Advertising?! Surely even the most interfering of council officers can see that this is a primary school project. But then is there nothing that local authorities won't regulate?

By Dylan Sharpe

Pressure mounts on NHS IT scheme

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 2 Comments

Although Britain's political system has been in stasis for the past five weeks (and looks likely to remain that way for the foreseeable future) a number of recent stories and columns have highlighted a growing resentment in the mainstream media towards the National Programme for IT (otherwise known as the Government's new-fangled NHS IT scheme).

Medicalrecords A superb example of this trend is an article written by Philip Johnston last week – prompted by the release of the terrific film Erasing David – in which Philip comprehensively deconstructs Connecting for Health and urges his readers to opt out.

Now the Mail on Sunday has entered the fray, yesterday running an article about the bully-boy tactics of the Summary Care Record 'opt out' form, which lists a series of unfounded and scaremongering consequences that could result if we try and avoid going onto the system:

The NHS is scaring patients into signing up to its controversial database – by claiming that those who refuse run the risk of receiving the wrong test results or the wrong drugs.

Dire warnings have been placed on the website of the agency in charge of the new IT system, saying that failure to sign up could lead to lost records and prescribing errors.

On Sunday night, a Department of Health spokesman said the problem of lost records or mistreatment was not a major concern, prompting speculation that the Government was making the claim to frighten patients into joining the database.

This form has been around for quite a while, but the Mail highlighting its pernicious presence is welcome and adds to the pressure mounting on the entire scheme. Massive credit should also go to the British Medical Association (BMA) for their efforts in revealing that patients were having their records uploaded onto the system without their consent.

With this sort of negative press, it surely is only a matter of time before a new government (however it looks) makes the right decision and puts an end to this ridiculous scheme.

By Dylan Sharpe

Yet more confidential medical records go missing

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | Leave a comment

Memory-stick A removable memory stick containing confidential medical records has been found in a supermarket car park, according to the BBC website:

A member of staff has been suspended after medical records belonging to patients at a secure hospital near Falkirk were found in a car park.

A computer memory stick containing the sensitive information was found by a 12-year-old boy outside an Asda store.

It reportedly contained the criminal histories of some violent patients as well as details about staff at the Tryst Park unit at Bellsdyke Hospital. 

Only last week we reported that the NHS had experienced more serious data breaches than any other institution in the UK; and used it as an example as to why the NHS Connecting for Health IT scheme needed urgent review.

But this latest data breach is also very relevant to our recent report Broken Records. The Trust involved in this case is NHS Forth Valley for whom – according to our research – 769 non-medical personnel have access to patient records.

Only when access to medical data is restricted to a need-to-know basis will this sort of fiasco stop happening.

By Dylan Sharpe

Media Coverage – May 2010

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | Comments Off
For all media enquiries please call:
07538 28 00 41 (24 hrs)


Monday 31st May

Daily Mirror – From CCTV cameras to cashpoints, store cards to miles, Big Brother is recording your life

But it begs the question – is there anything we do that isn’t recorded? “We are constantly under surveillance,” says Dylan Sharpe of Big Brother Watch. “We’re tracked from the moment we leave the house. This sort of sophisticated surveillance is more reminiscent of Soviet Russia.

“We’ve more CCTV than any other country, we’re tracked on countless databases.”

The Herald Scotland – Security row after Google maps all UK WiFi networks

Google now faces a number of class-action lawsuits around the world from campaigners concerned that the internet giant is intercepting personal data.

The European Privacy Association and Big Brother Watch says the UK should also be investigating the amount of data Google holds about its users.

Guardian.co.uk – Matthew Sinclair: Libel fee structure is fundamentally unjust

But some cases do come to light. For example, Willard Foxton reported what happened to him on the Big Brother Watch website. He was editor of a new investigative magazine from legal publishers Chambers and Partners, Chambers Report.


Sunday 30th May

Ilford Recorder – Redbridge Council increase spying on residents


Saturday
29th May

Richmond and Twickenham Times – Richmond Council slammed for using ‘snooper law’ 14 times

Hillingdon Uxbridge Gazette – Hillingdon Council’s use of covert surveillance results in no prosecutions

Jack FM – Alex Deane interviewed on RIPA

Blackpool Gazette – I might sue over my scrapped ID card, says Blunkett

Northampton Chronicle – I might sue over my scrapped ID card, says Blunkett

Goole Courier – I might sue over my scrapped ID card, says Blunkett

Wakefield Express – I might sue over my scrapped ID card, says Blunkett

Sheffield Telegraph – I might sue over my scrapped ID card, says Blunkett

TalkSport – Alex Deane interviewed on RIPA


Friday
28th May

Daily Express – Labour’s ID cards scrapped

Alex Deane, of pressure group Big Brother Watch, said: “This is one in the eye for the authoritarian busybodies. Most people hated the ID cards.”

Daily Mirror – Inland Revenue sends up to 50,000 people’s details to wrong homes in tax blunder

Big Brother Watch, which campaigns against intrusions of privacy, demanded action from the coalition Government.

Spokesman Dylan Sharpe said: “This latest error again highlights the dangers of databases and the slack approach to private data in our civil service.”

BBC Radio 2 – Alex Deane interviewed on the Jeremy Vine Show

Yorkshire Post – Blunkett: I want my money back over ID cards

Sheffield Telegraph – I might sue over my scrapped ID card, says Blunkett

Your Canterbury.co.uk – Councils
accused of ‘Big Brother’ surveillance

Redbridge Guardian – Pressure mounting on council to curb surveillance on residents

Darlington and Stockton Times – Hambleton Council: an unlikely Big Brother

Kent Online – Councils accused of Big Brother surveillance

Bexley News Shopper – Council uses ‘terrorist’ powers to snoop on licensees

East Coast FM

Your Thanet.co.uk – Councils accused of ‘Big Brother’ surveillance

The Herald Scotland – Tax chiefs say sorry for private bank data blunder

Rochdale Online – Is the Council using ‘Big Brother’ spies?


Thursday
27th May

BBC Breakfast – Alex Deane interviewed on CCTV

Daily Telegraph – ID cards to be axed within 100 days

Alex Deane, of pressure group Big Brother Watch, said: “The ID card
scheme’s demise is one in the eye for the authoritarian busybodies.”

Daily Mail – Coalition scraps Labour’s £5billion ID card scheme

BBC Radio Newcastle

Minster FM – 50,000 Affected By Data Blunder At HMRC

V3.co.uk – ICO criticised for stance on Google Wi-Fi scandal

Evening Standard – We need police to watch our streets, not CCTV cameras

Waltham Forest Guardian – Police plan filming to stop violence

Dylan Sharpe of Big Brother Watch, which campaigns against invasions of privacy, said: “Britain already has more CCTV cameras than any other country, yet the Metropolitan Police have admitted that just one crime is solved for every 1000 cameras in London.

“Mass surveillance doesn’t stop criminals and it only has a marginal effect on solving crimes. Rather than increasing the number of cameras, Waltham Forest should be putting more police on the streets.”

Bromley Times – Council ‘spied’ on residents 150 times

Northwood Gazette – Councils defend use of spying powers in Three Rivers and Hertfordshire

Southern Daily Echo – Snooping powers used more and more by councils

Kable – CCTV regulation set to impact councils

The council has spent over £20m installing CCTV cameras and has 1,113, according to Freedom of Information data compiled by campaign group Big Brother Watch in December 2009. The group said that this is more per person than any other London borough, with 4.3 cameras for each 1,000 people.

ourKingdom – Alex Deane: So far, so good – but there is more to come for ID cards

Yahoo News – ICO criticised for stance on Google Wi-Fi scandal

Society of Procurement Officers – CCTV regulation set to impact councils

24dash.com – National ID cards scheme to be scrapped ‘within 100 days’

Silobreaker – Council denies Big Brother Watch claims


Wednesday
26th May

BBC Radio Coventry and Warwickshire

Law Society Gazette – Smile for the camera because Big Brother is watching you

Burton Mail – Council use of snooping laws is not getting results

Lincolnshire Echo – Council spies follow 117 innocent people over the last two years

Hounslow Chronicle – Richmond Council slammed for ‘spying on residents’

Get Surrey – Surveillance powers used by Surrey County Council

The Stirrer – I spy with my little eye

Mix 96.co.uk – Bucks County Council Carried Out 74 Surveillance Operations 


Tuesday
25th May

GMTV – Alex Deane interviewed regarding Queen’s Speech

Guardian.co.uk – Alex Deane: Councils should be stopped from spying

Oxford Mail – Councils defend use of CCTV to fight fraud

Lancashire Evening Post – Council spies lead to just 15 prosecutions

Oldham Evening Chronicle – Council calls-off ‘Big Brother’ spies

Liverpool Echo – Merseyside councils used snoop law against own staff

Liverpool Echo – Do surveillance cameras pay their way for Liverpool city council?

Birmingham Mail – Walsall Council defends spying on locals

Waltham Forest Guardian – Council featured in report on surveillance use

Salisbury Journal – New figures on council ‘spy powers’

Bucks Free Press – One in seven council ‘spy’ led to prosecutions in Buckinghamshire

Witney Gazette – Councils defend use of CCTV to fight fraud

BBC Radio Teeside

Leith FM

BBC Radio Merseyside

Mix 96 Buckinghamshire

BBC Oxfordshire

eGov Monitor – Local Councils Abuse RIPA To Snoop on More Than 8500 Targets Including Own Staff


Monday
24th May

The Times – Smokers and tramps join 8,000 council surveillance targets

Councils carried out more than 8,500 secret snooping operations on members of the public during the past two years,including spying on dog owners, fly tippers and loan sharks, according to a report published today.

Secret surveillance operations also took place against smokers, suspected benefit fraudsters, vagrants buying alcohol for under-18s and people repairing vehicles in the street.

Alex Deane, the director of Big Brother Watch, which carried out the survey, based on freedom of information requests, said: “Now that the absurd and excessive use of Ripa surveillance has been revealed, these powers have to be taken away from councils.

Daily Telegraph – Councils using anti-terror laws to spy on dog walkers

Guardian – Councils carry out over 8,500 covert surveillance operations

The Independent – Councils’ covert surveillance operations revealed

Daily Mail – How town hall snoopers are watching you: Councils use anti-terror laws to spy on charity shops and dog-walkers

Daily Express – Town hall snoopers use terror laws to trap charity donors

Daily Mirror – Big Bro still spying with ConDems

The Sun – 11 snoops every day

Evening Standard – Councils
‘abusing spying powers’

Daily Star – You’re spied on 11 times a day!

Metro – Town halls spy on us 11 times a day

BBC Radio 4 Today Programme – Listen here

Ipswich Evening Star – Concern over use of ‘snooping’ law

Buckinghamshire Advertiser – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Yorkshire Post – Spies snooped Councils misuse terror powers

Beccles and Bungay Journal – Concern over use of ‘snooping’ law

Cumbria News and Star – Cumbria council uses terror laws to nick dog foulers

Crosby Herald – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

East London Advertiser – Big Brother Watch slams local councils for ‘spying’ on public

Sunday Sun – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Newcastle Evening Chronicle – Newcastle City Council keeping an eye on us

Herald Scotland – Controversy over councils’ secret spying

Sheffield Telegraph – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

The Lowestoft Journal – Concern over use of ‘snooping’ law

Press and Journal – Councils abusing surveillance rights – report

Flintshire Chronicle – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Newbury Today – West Berkshire Council is among the highest in the country for spying on people

North Wales Daily Post – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Daily Record – Councils snoop on pooches

Uxbridge Gazette – ‘Spying powers’ have not led to prosecution

Cambridge News – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

East Anglian Daily Times – Concern over use of ‘snooping’ law

Burton Mail – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Peterborough Evening Telegraph – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Redbridge Advertiser – Council ‘spying’ up three-fold

Allerdale News and Star – Allerdale council using terror laws to nick dog foulers

Oxford Times – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Derbyshire Times – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

BBC Radio Gloucestershire

BBC Radio Newcastle

City Radio Liverpool

106 Time FM

BBC Radio York

96.4FM BRMB Radio Birmingham

BBC Radio Scotland

Hertfordshire Jack FM

Pirate FM Radio Cornwall

BBC Radio West Midlands

LBC 97.3 FM

BBC Radio York

Telegraph.co.uk – Councils should not be allowed to spy on people

The excellent Big Brother Watch group, which has chronicled Britain’s descent into one gigantic film set for the 1984 remake, has published new research chronicling the widespread, almost ubiquitous, use of surveillance powers by local councils, conducting over 8,500 RIPA operations in the past two years.

MSN News – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

LocalGov.co.uk – Survey highlights council surveillance ‘offenders’

Tech Eye.net – Councils use absurd excuses to spy on us – official

Public Service – Is your local council watching you?

24Dash.com – Grim Ripa report exposes councils’ ‘absurd’ use of surveillance powers

Local Government Lawyer – Councils conducting eleven RIPA surveillance operations “every day”: campaign group

Top News – Councils misusing Ripa powers

Press Association – Councils ‘abusing spying powers’

Third Sector – People leaving donation bags outside charity shops have been subject to surveillance by local councils

Telegraph.co.uk – Failure to scoop a poop: an act of terrorism?

ConservativeHome – The Grim Ripa

Swell Pets – Dog walkers snooped on while out with dog leads


Sunday
23rd May

News of the World – Councils spy on dog owners, charity donors and smokers

YOU’VE been framed! Armies of council spies with video and CCTV are secretly monitoring Britain – out to nail us on a string of petty offences like not using a pooper scooper. 

Civil liberties group Big Brother Watch releases its report “The Grim RIPA” tomorrow detailing the worst excesses. Director Alex Deane said: “This shows our calls for the removal of RIPA from councils cannot be ignored. They’re not responsible enough to use these intrusive powers.” 

News of the World Blog – Council snoopers keep on snooping


Friday
21st May

BBC Surrey and Sussex – Alex Deane interviewed by Danny Pike


Thursday
20th May

Newcastle Gazette – Pat Thompson’s daughter tells of heartache

In the past, concerns have been raised over Google Earth and Google
Street View amid fears they could be used as a “window shopping” tool by
burglars.

Alex Deane, director of privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch,
said: “We have warned since Google Earth began that it not only intruded
on privacy, but also posed real dangers to potential victims of crime.
This case tragically confirms that, in the worst possible way.”

Fox News – Britain’s deputy chief will scrap ID card program, trim DNA database in civil liberties push

No figure on the total number of CCTV cameras in
Britain is known, though applications under Freedom of Information laws
in 2009 disclosed that town halls operate about 60,000 — up from 21,000
in 1999.

Dylan Sharpe, of Big Brother Watch, a campaign
group which carried out the 2009 research, said many plans in Clegg’s
speech appeared sketchy.

“It’s brilliant on big ideas, all
of which we are in agreement with — but it’s not so strong on the
detail,” Sharpe said.

Boston Globe – British leader vows to scale back surveillance of citizenry


Wednesday 19th May

Sky News – Dylan Sharpe interviewed by Martin Stanford

Public Service – Intrusive IT projects ‘have to stop’

Big Brother Watch’s Alex Deane said he welcomed the changes, but warned the real challenge will be implementing the reforms in the face of strong opposition from the civil service.

“Local councils and the police are very protective of CCTV and the DNA database; bureaucrats love their power; there will also be calls for a system to replace the ContactPoint database. This government must learn from the mistakes of its predecessor and not bow to such pressures,” he said.

The Portsmouth News – Children’s Minister stands down from school CCTV firm

BBC Sussex and Surrey – Dylan Sharpe interviewed about Nick Clegg’s Great Reform Act speech

Canada Business Online – Britain’s deputy chief will scrap ID card program, trim DNA database in civil liberties push

Associated Press – UK’s Clegg plans civil liberties drive

Guardian.co.uk – The Technology newsbucket

Although it’s widely supposed that over the past decade there has been a significant increase in the number of surveillance cameras in the UK, it wasn’t until last year that hard numbers emerged via a Freedom of Information request. Big Brother Watch, an anti-surveillance campaign group, found that the number of council-owned cameras had risen from 21,000 to 60,000 in less than ten years — equal to one CCTV camera for every 1,000 people in the country


Tuesday
18th May

ITV Central – Alex Deane interviewed on CCTV

Daily Express – ‘Spy on your neighbours’ bins’ says council

Last night there were warnings that local authorities nationwide will follow Hull City Council’s lead in signing up neighbourhood spies.

Alex Deane, of campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: “Cash-strapped councils are increasingly recruiting residents to do their dirty work, creating a nation of citizen snoopers.

“Hull council has taken the lead by forming a bin Stasi, creating a scheme whereby people are encouraged to in­form on others. It is creepy and extreme – totally disproportionate.”

SunTalk – Alex Deane interviewed on NICE home inspections

Warrington Guardian – Children’s minister quits firm role

Alex Deane, director of Big Brother Watch, said: “Tim Loughton could not plausibly hold on to a directorship of this company when appointed education minister in a Government which has pledged to roll back the surveillance state.

“He had to give up one or the other. Just in time, he has made the right decision.”

Buxton Advertiser – Children’s Minister stands down from school CCTV firm


Monday
17th May

BBC Look North – Alex Deane interviewed regarding Hull bin snooping

BBC Radio Humberside – Alex Deane interviewed by Peter Levy


Saturday
15th May

Corus FM – Alex Deane interviewed on Roy Green Show

Thursday
13th May

Colourful Radio – Alex Deane interviewed on civil liberties in the new coalition

Alex Deane speaks to Oxford Union: “This House Believes That Civil Liberties should always come before Public Security, even when confronting International Terrorism.”


Wednesday
12th May

Alex Deane interviewed about civil liberties in Britain on Talk Radio Europe

Talk Radio Europe – Wednesday news round-up

Dylan Sharpe, campaign director of Big Brother Watch has said that the whole handling of the care record system has been sneaky and under hand, with the government doing anything to prevent people of opting out of the system.


Tuesday
11th May

Smooth Radio – Alex Deane interviewed about Mayor Bloomberg’s visit to London to inspect London Underground CCTV

Top News Singapore – NHS scaring patients into accepting electronic records database


Monday
10th May

Pulse – NHS ‘scaring patients’ over electronic records

The Daily Telegraph and the Daily Mail this morning cover the charge from privacy campaigners Big Brother Watch that Connecting for Health may be ‘scaring’ patients into agreeing to have a Summary Care Record.

The lobby group accused Connecting for Health of overstating the risk to patients if they opt out of the system, after a Department of Health spokesman apparently contradicted dire warnings placed on the Connecting for Health website.

Children and Young People Now – In the News

BBC Radio Sussex – Dylan Sharpe interviewed by Danny Pike

Daily Telegraph – NHS ‘scaring patients into accepting electronic records database’

Yesterday the Big Brother Watch lobby group accused Connecting for Health of overstating the risk to patients if they opt out of the system, after a Department of Health spokesman said the problem of lost paper records was not “significant” as the agency claimed.

Dylan Sharpe, the Big Brother Watch campaign director, told the Daily Mail: “If you value your privacy ignore these false and misleading warnings and opt out.”


Sunday 9th May

Mail on Sunday – The patients ‘bullied’ into joining NHS database

Dylan Sharpe, campaign director of Big Brother Watch, said: ‘The whole handling of the summary care record system has been sneaky and underhand, with the government doing anything to prevent people from opting out of the system.

‘If you value your privacy, ignore these false and misleading warnings and opt out.’

The Scotsman – Dani Garavelli: Just the style that’s criminal

So sentence Drummond for his crimes by all means. But let his offences against good taste remain a matter for his conscience alone. For, as Alex Deane, the director of the civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, so eloquently put it: “The proper punishment for the comically low-riding trousers favoured by some people is that we all think they look ridiculous.”


Saturday 8th May

Corus FM – Alex Deane interviewed on Roy Green Show


Thursday 6th May

Daily Echo – Crimes against fashion

Ellis Drummond, 18, faced a ban on the clothing because he was considered to be wearing it in an ‘intimidatory manner’.

He was backed by civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, which claimed the original Asbo would have been completely unenforceable’.

Director Alex Deane told newspapers: “The proper punishment for the comically low-riding trousers favoured by some people is that we all think they look ridiculous.”


Wednesday
5th May

The Times – Judge rules Asbo on low-slung trousers illegal

Alex Deane, director of the civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, said: “The proper punishment for the comically low-riding trousers favoured by some people is that we all think they look like idiots.”

The Sun – Low trouser Asbo is pants

Alex Deane, of civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, said: “There is no human right to show your pants.

The Scottish Sun – Low trouser Asbo is pants

Sky News – Teenager Escapes Asbo Ban On Trousers

The Daily Express – Yob wins as Asbo is scrapped due to human rights breach

The Daily Star – Pants rule breaches human rights

Alex Deane interviewed by Jon Gaunt on SunTalk

Daily Mirror – Low trousers ban broke yob’s rights

The Register – Judge de-ASBOes yoof’s low-slung kecks

Alex Deane interviewed on BBC Radio Northampton

Alex Deane interviewed on BBC Radio Sussex

Yahoo News – Teenager Escapes Asbo Ban On Trousers

The Metro – Lawyers claim anti-social trousers ban on teenager is pants


Tuesday
4th May

Daily Mail – Yob wins right to wear trousers that show his underpants after judge said Asbo ruling would ‘breach human rights’

Alex Deane, director of civil liberties Big Brother Watch, said the Asbo would have been ‘completely unenforceable’.

He said: ‘As in this case, the term “human rights” is frequently abused, rightly leading to ridicule. There is no human right to show people your pants.

‘The proper punishment for the comically low-riding trousers favoured by some people is that we all think they look like idiots.’

Monday 3rd May

Wired – Investigation: A sharp focus on CCTV

Although it’s widely supposed that over the past decade there has been a significant increase in the number of surveillance cameras in the UK, it wasn’t until last year that hard numbers emerged via a Freedom of Information request.

Big Brother Watch, an anti-surveillance campaign group, found that the number of council-owned cameras had risen from 21,000 to 60,000 in less than ten years — equal to one CCTV camera for every 1,000 people in the country. Its report demonstrated a trebling of investment in local CCTV — even though Home Office research published in 2002 suggested that CCTV has a negligible impact on reducing crime. 


Sunday 2nd May

Alex Deane interviewed on Roy Green Show

Fined for talking about tax

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 8 Comments


RedstonA This morning the Daily Mail has covered a very worrying story about changes to the law which effectively make it a criminal act to dispense tax advice. The woman behind the story – Anne Redston, a Visiting Professor in tax law at King’s College London – has written the following blogpost exclusively for Big Brother Watch.

Have you ever suggested an ISA might be a good investment, helped an elderly relative reclaim overpaid tax, or been encouraged to use gift aid? This sort of advice could soon cost you £1,500 or more. 

HM Revenue and Customs have drafted new laws penalising ‘deliberate wrongdoing’ – but this isn’t about hiding money in foreign bank accounts. 

Instead, ‘deliberate wrongdoing’ is defined as an act capable of causing a ‘loss of tax.’ This in turn is defined as ‘relief, reduction, repayment or credit of any kind.’ These definitions mean that any advice on saving tax could be subject to a penalty.

How much?

The maximum penalty is 100% of the tax ‘lost’, but with minimum £5,000 (reduced to £1,500 if you confess your wrongdoing to HMRC before they discover about it). There is also a ceiling of £50,000 – but this is per person, per tax, per year, so it could be much higher.

Who’s affected?

The draft law also makes it clear that these new rules apply to everyone, although lawyers and journalists have special protection. Of course, this legislation will be particularly tough on those whose day job involves giving tax advice, such as accountants and financial advisers.

And for them there is extra punishment – HMRC can take away all their client files – not just those files relating to the ‘wrongdoing’ – but all files, from all clients, including former clients. 

Is this necessary?

Very definitely not! The taxman already has a huge armoury of legal powers to investigate genuine tax offences. 

Although HMRC may say it will only use the powers ‘reasonably’ or ‘proportionately’, once a government body has such draconian powers, the temptation to use them is overwhelming.  The taxman already deploys the anti-terrorism powers in the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) over 5,000 times a year. And councils are using the same powers to check your rubbish bins.

What next?

You can find the draft rules by going on to the HMRC site (www.hmrc.gov.uk)  and searching under ‘draft legislation and deliberate wrongdoing’ and then reading from page 11.  It is too late to respond formally but you could still try sending your comments to HMRC at: [email protected]

And of course, you could ask your (prospective) MP to oppose these new extreme powers. I hope you will.

Pushing for Repeal

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 25 Comments

Yesterday in an interview with the Sunday Times, David Cameron formally announced his intentions for a Great Repeal Bill:

The centrepiece of the Tories’ Queen’s speech, to be held within the next month if the party forms a government, would be a “great repeal bill”.

This would scrap ID cards, home information packs and dozens of rarely enforced criminal offences introduced by Labour over 13 years.

For those unaware, this policy was first exclusively revealed by Shadow Justice Minister, Dominic Grieve QC MP, at a Big Brother Watch event in February; and it was disappointing to see it omitted from the final Conservative Manifesto. The same could not be said of the Lib Dem manifesto – which included a line on a 'Freedom Bill'.

However, the original idea for the Repeal Act should go to Douglas Carswell and Dan Hannan – who have been beating this drum since the release of their celebrated book 'The Plan'. The motivations behind this bill can be simply put: There have been over 4,300 offences created by the government since 1997.

It equates to an average of 28 offences every month since Labour came to power or a new law a day.

In the Big Brother Watch Manifesto we spell-out some – though, due to space restrictions, not all – of the laws and programmes we would love to see consigned to the great legislative wheelie bin in the sky. For instance:

- ContactPoint
- Control Orders
- The Independent Safeguarding Authority
- The National Identity Register and ID card
- The Community Accreditation Scheme

These are just a few – but what other laws are ripe for repeal?

By Dylan Sharpe

NHS data revelations bode badly for NPfIT

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 1 Comment

Keeping_Track_Of_Files When Big Brother Watch released our report into the security of confidential medical dataBroken Records – one of our arguments against the number of non-medical personnel having access to patient records was the huge incidence of data loss within the NHS.

Today that fear has been confirmed as – for at the least the second year running – the NHS has topped the list of UK organisations subject to the highest number of data breaches. As reported by the Health Service Journal:

More serious data breaches have taken place within the NHS than any other UK organisation, according to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).

A total of 2897 breaches were reported, accounting for more than 30% of the total number, deputy commissioner David Smith told the Infosec security conference.

The NHS, which is currently introducing digital patient records, said that 113 incidents occurred due to stolen data or hardware, with a further 82 cases of lost data or hardware.

How can we be expected to have faith in the government's new online programme, when the NHS is incapable of keeping our private data safe now?

The Summary Care Record will provide over half-a-million people with access to our medical records and therefore massively increase the chances of that data falling into the wrong hands.

This latest scandal provides further proof that if you are contacted by the NHS asking for permission to upload your medical records onto the database, take the opportunity and opt out.

By Dylan Sharpe

Muddles and mistakes in NHS IT

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | Leave a comment

GP Last week we were celebrating 'a small victory on medical records privacy' after the Government ordered the uploading of patient care records to be suspended in areas where the Department of Health had launched an accelerated rollout. It seems we were too quick on the cake and party-poppers, as Pulse explains:

It has emerged that Connecting for Health has still not acted on the ruling to provide guidance to trusts about what they should do next, with some NHS bodies apparently pushing ahead with the rollout despite ministers’ intervention.

This week Connecting for Health was refusing to say whether it planned to offer trusts any guidance – or even to give Pulse a definitive list of the areas involved in the accelerated rollout so GPs would know if they were affected and advise their patients accordingly.

Dr Grant Ingrams, chair of the GPC IT sub committee, said trusts had been left to flounder because of the lack of direction from the DH.

As I was saying yesterday, there have been a number of civil liberties issues that have so far been absent from the election campaign. Of course funding for the NHS has cropped up on a number of occasions, but the huge white elephant in the room – the future of the NPfIT – remains ignored.

I've noticed that in recent weeks that a number of journalists are cottoning on; with great articles on the security of our private medical records written in the Daily Mirror, Daily Mail, and Yorkshire Post

It would be welcomed if the parties were to spell out their plans for the NHS IT system after 6th May…but we won't be holding our breath. With every piece of bad press, the Summary Care Record system comes under further scrutiny and the muddles and mistakes at the heart of the project are revealed.

By Dylan Sharpe

Hauled into court over a cardboard box

Posted on by Big Brother Watch Posted in Home | 7 Comments

Recycling Centre The following tale is as classic a Big Brother Watch story as you are likely to find; as The Sun reports:

A grandmother was dragged to court – after carefully leaving a cardboard box next to a council recycling bin.

Lynne had taken the box which held her new washing machine to the recycling point at a Somerfield supermarket near her home in Wickford, Essex, in October.

It was too big to fit in the slot and the bin was nearly full. Lynne, 59, was filmed wedging it between two bins to stop it blowing away. Days later she got a card from Basildon Council asking her to call about "an incident".

An environmental officer later turned up at the fancy dress shop she runs and handed her a £300 fine. She threw it in a bin and ordered him out. On March 22 she received a letter charging her with "depositing controlled waste" and summoning her before JPs.

That's right people – just for putting a cardboard box in-between two bins which were too small to take the full box, Lynne Doyle was fined £300. Many would have been bullied by the council into paying up.

Luckily, Lynne did not…so she was ordered before a court. However on the advice of a lawyer she requested trial by jury. What do you think happened…?

She has now received a letter, without apology or explanation, saying the council was dropping the case.

So Lynne gets threatened with a fine and then trial; but when she pushes back the council retreats. It shouldn't end there – if you are outraged by this action by Basildon, the contact details for their refuse and recycling team are here. Why not ask them why they subjected a 59 year-old women to this ordeal?

By Dylan Sharpe