According to the ICO yesterday, a former gambling industry worker has plead guilty to committing three offences under section 55 of the Data Protection Act. For these offences, Marc Ben-Ezra was handed a three year conditional discharge and £1,700 fine in addition to just over £800 pounds in court fees. This is his penance for selling more than 65,000 individuals’ personal data for a profit of around £25,000.
This case is a particularly blaring example of where the laws surrounding data protection are lacking. Not only was Mr Ben-Ezra able to obtain and remove personal data from his place of work, but he was able to make a profit from doing so-even after his sentence for pleading guilty was handed down. Read more
“The Supreme Court says pornography is anything without artistic merit that causes sexual thoughts; that’s their definition, essentially. No artistic merit, causes sexual thoughts. Hmm. . . . Sounds like . . . every commercial on television, doesn’t it?” Bill Hicks
Later today we’re expecting a speech from the Prime Minister on internet adult content and how four of the UK’s biggest internet service providers (ISPs) are agreeing to implement an opt-in to adult material online.
We should tread very carefully when developing state-sanctioned censorship of the internet. Let alone the quagmire of deciding what should be censored, it is a dangerous path to go down to expect technology to replace parental oversight and responsibility.
So far, Big Brother Watch has been busy at Conservative Party Conference. Thanks to our Director, Nick Pickles, and former Director, Daniel Hamilton, our fringe events went excellently. We have heard a lot of interesting comments and support since the weekend as well.
Yesterday, Conor Burns MP, took part in our fringe event on the Coalition’s track record with civil liberties. He discussed a policies including the limits the European Arrest Warrant places on the British system, a British Bill of Rights and other issues with the rule of law and due process. His comments were featured on the BBC news site last night and can be found here. We also heard great words from David Jones MP as he spoke of some of the victories civil liberties campaigners have seen since the Coalition came into power. These are encouraging developments, but of course, we’re anxious to see more! Read more
Big Brother Watch is once again participating in the Freedom Zone at Conservative Conference, hosting two meetings with a range of excellent speakers.
On the Sunday, I’ll be discussing the European Arrest Warrant, and the urgent need to reform its use. Speakers include Nick de Bois MP, leader of the Conservatives in the European Parliament Martin Callanan MEP, Dominic Raab MP and Andrew Symeou, a victim of European Arrest Warrant. (Sunday 2 October: 4.45pm: The European Arrest Warrant: Time for Urgent Reform)
Monday will see a broader discussion of the Coalitions’ track record on civil liberties and what the remaining years of the Parliament may hold. Speakers include Conor Burns MP, David Jones MP and former Big Brother Watch Director, Dan Hamilton. (Monday 3 October, 3.15pm: Freedom, Privacy and Civil Liberties: Where next for the Coalition?)
I will also be speaking at a Taxpayers Alliance event looking at Digital Policy under the Coalition. I’ve promised to try to keep my opinions on Cliff Richard under wraps during what is sure to be a lively fringe meeting. (Tuesday 4 October, 1.45pm: Digital Policy Under the Coalition)
So if you’ll be around at Conference, do step into one of our events, we’d love to see you there. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter @bbw1984 to see our latest news, blogs and information from across the weekend.
The news that online gambling firm Betfair lost millions of customers’ credit card details in a cyber attack 18 months ago – and then did not notify customers - is nothing short of a scandal.
For the personal details of millions of customers to be lost is one thing – but to then fail to inform those affected is outrageous. Whoever made the decision to sacrifice the financial security of millions of people for the sake of Betfair’s reputation should resign immediately.
Big Brother Watch has continued to highlight how the regulation of personal data in the UK is dangerously lacking. This incident reaffirms the need for more severe penalties for individuals and companies who do not fulfil their responsibility to protect personal information.
It once again highlights how the volume of personal information held by private companies poses a clear threat to individual privacy and civil liberties if it s not adequately protected.
If also reaffirms the need for consumers to have a ‘right to know’ about security breaches concerning their own data, as is the case in the US.
Ivan Lewis, the Labour Shadow Culture Secretary, has proposed tighter regulations for bad journalists, calling for them to be struck off a register of professional journalists for questionable work. This announcement came with Lewis’ speech intended as a “message to Murdoch” following the phone hacking scandal.
Lewis claims to uphold the ideals of a free press in Britain, but follows this claim up with a statement leading to further regulation of journalists, saying:
“Neither the current broken system of self regulation or state oversight will achieve the right balance. We need a new system of independent regulation including proper like for like redress which means mistakes and falsehoods on the front page receive apologies and retraction on the front page. And as in other professions the industry should consider whether people guilty of gross malpractice should be struck off.”
We’ve learned several lessons from CCTV in recent weeks and the desired and actual effects of it on social behaviour. This weekend, rugby player Mike Tindall was shown in a questionable situation on CCTV footage from a club in New Zealand. Thousands of hours of CCTV footage during the UK riots have been scoured by hundreds of people and yet have brought a relatively small number of fresh offenders to court. What we’ve learned is that no number of cameras creates the magic ‘fix’ that stops crimes from taking place. Instead, they are an unwelcome invasion into our privacy, expensive investments that could be better spent elsewhere, and an ineffective means of ‘policing’, whether it be on the streets, in the bars, or the office. Read more
In 2008 in New Jersey in the US, Albert Florence, was mistakenly arrested in front of his pregnant wife and young son, taken to jail, strip searched and humiliated in an overly intrusive manner for the minor offence of failing to pay a fine. His lawyer is filing suit against the New Jersey jails on the grounds that the strip search the man endured was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights protecting him from unreasonable search and seizure. Florence is one of a number of individuals filing suit for undergoing a strip search for offences including driving with a noisy muffler, failing to use a turn signal, and riding a bicycle without an audible bell.
Florence and his lawyer claim he gave no reason to be suspected of carrying contraband and the search conducted was unnecessary and invasive. The courts and the American Bar Association, however, are split on the issue. Following a court decision in 1979, Bell vs. Wolfish, courts have interpreted the verdict to protect the Fourth Amendment of criminals charged with minor crimes, but does not bar law enforcement from conducting intrusive body searches on them entirely. Officers must show reasonable cause for the searches in the cases of those charged only of minor crimes. However, the other argument is, of course, that it is in the interest of law enforcement to ensure the prevention of contraband entering into the prison population. They claim that by preventing strip searches in cases of minor offences, it would, in effect, provide a route for drugs and weapons to enter jails. Read more