In the Sunday Telegraph yesterday, I was saddened to see that Public Policy Editor, Alasdair Palmer, had written a particularly wretched article decrying the scrapping of ID cards and innocent DNA retention.
The article – with its delightfully understated title 'Why the coalition is set to bring us a rise in crime' – has numerous flaws which require urgent correction:
Most of us think that a top priority of any effective government should be to have clear and coherent policies on cutting crime. So it’s surprising to discover that the deal between the Tories and the Lib Dems says nothing about it.
The closest it gets is a statement that “the parties agree to implement a full programme of measures to reverse the substantial erosion of civil liberties under the Labour government and roll back state intrusion” – which means, among other things, abolishing ID cards and “adopting the protections of the Scottish model for the DNA database”.
But getting rid of ID cards and making it harder for the police to retain DNA records is not going to reduce crime: if anything, it will increase it, by making crime harder to detect and criminals more difficult to apprehend.
Urgh! Before reminding Mr Palmer of the piddling issues of personal privacy and habeas corpus, let's consider the statistics, shall we?
As was revealed earlier this year, just 0.3% of solved crimes in Britain are due to the DNA database. The research shows that – despite the massive expansion in the Government database – only 3,666 crimes are detected every year with links to an existing DNA profile. The Scottish model, which Alasdair seems so opposed to, simply reduces the length of time innocent DNA profiles (around a third of the current database) can be retained from 6 to 3 years.
I would love to ask Mr Palmer how he thinks ID cards would facilitate crime prevention? Is his ideal world one in which every UK citizen carries identification that the Police can order to see at any time; to paraphrase our new PM's infamous gaffe – "ver are your papers?" Not even our overbearing previous government were ready to go that far!
But the greater point is that, given the very minor crime fighting benefit – and we are yet to be convinced by any case in which a previously innocent person's DNA profile has helped solve a crime – is Alasdair Palmer really prepared to spend billions on an ID card scheme and enormous state DNA database that puts our identity and biometric data in the hands of countless thousands of government bureaucrats?
Government rates of data loss, abuse of data, and the very simple fact that liberty is ours to keep, not the state's to take, should be enough. But Mr Palmer seems ready to sacrifice all of this simply to appear tough on crime. Shameful.
By Dylan Sharpe